PETE’S LOVE CHILDS
What?
PETER Andre
Oh, him.
got to grips with busty Essex girl Amy Childs
Who?
on a boozy night out.
But... do you see? PETE'S LOVE CHILDS. Eh? Haha. It makes it look like he's got love childs, children, oh this doesn't work properly, LOVE CHILD...S, do you get it?, see?, love... child...s, isn't it? LOVE CHILDS. LIKE LOVE CHILDREN. DO YOU GET IT? LIKE A LOVE CHILD. BUT SHE'S CALLED CHILDS SO IT DOESN'T QUITE WORK PROPERLY. LOVE CHILDS. DO YOU SEE? LOVE CHILDS. LOVE CHILDS. LOVE CHILDS. LOVE CHILDS. LOVE CHILDS. KEEP SAYING IT AND IT'LL MAKE MORE SENSE. LOVE CHILDS. Yes? Love Childs. Pete's Love Childs. What? Wait, Pete's love Childs? Pete's what, why?
Yes. Love childs. Love Childs. Pete's love Childs. Pete's love Childs. Pete's love Childs. Pete's... love Childs. No, Pete... loves Childs. Yes, that's the one that would make sense, but that doesn't make any sense. PETE'S LOVE CHILDS. Pete's love childs. No, Pete's Love Childs. No, Pete's love Childs. Right? Pete's love Childs. Pete's love Childs. PETE'S LOVE CHILDS. PETE LOVES CHILDS. Aha! But no. Those aren't the words on the page. PETE'S LOVE CHILDS. PETE'S LOVE CHILDS. Keep saying it, and soon it'll make sense. The more you look at it, the better it gets. PETE'S LOVE CHILDS. Pete's... love childs. Children. Childs. Childs, it's her name, Childs. See, she's called Childs, so he, well, he doesn't love her, but he stood next to her in a nightclub in Essex, and so he loves her, a bit, or he's been in the same photograph, and LOVE CHILDS. BUT PETE'S LOVE CHILDS. Pete, that's him, possesses 'Love Childs', which as we all know is the nickname for busty Essex girl Amy Childs, isn't it? That's what they're calling her all the time on ITV2+1, isn't it? You know, the programme may as well be called LOVE CHILDS, mightn't it?
PETE'S LOVE CHILDS.
Meanwhile,
Meanwhile Jordan was due at Alton Towers yesterday with pals for a VIP weekend.
PETE'S LOVE CHILDS. Make it go away. Make it go away now.
Related posts:




March 27th, 2011 - 09:30
Great. That’s stuck in my head now.
March 27th, 2011 - 11:17
Love it. Or should that be ‘Loves it’?
March 28th, 2011 - 20:27
Also, man looks at woman’s arse!
March 29th, 2011 - 01:31
Love… Childs…
What the fuck?
Dear god. I’ve never, ever seen a more diabolically shit headline than that.
Here, listen to some nice music to take your mind off it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IluVWcNtR8
March 29th, 2011 - 11:05
Steve, I feel it.
Nell, I’m almost tempted to say “Love’s it”.
March 29th, 2011 - 16:29
Like a pear cider made from a hundred percent pear.
March 29th, 2011 - 17:58
(s)
March 30th, 2011 - 08:57
It kind of works if you read it as ‘Pete’s love: Childs.’
But that still isn’t what they printed.
March 30th, 2011 - 15:27
These tabloid people are in hell. Do not seek join them there!
April 3rd, 2011 - 10:31
Shouldn’t it be
Pete Loves Childs? Or would some misinterpret it to Children?
April 3rd, 2011 - 14:43
In years to come, people will come to this very page looking to ascertain what Richard Desmond’s Daily Star Actually wrote about before it became nothing but a promotional vehicle for Richard Desmond’s Big Brother on Richard Desmond’s Channel 5.
As you can see, my as-yet unmet friends from the future, it has always been shit.
April 4th, 2011 - 13:09
I think they were going for “Pete’s love, Childs” but they left out the comma.