Tooled up TV
If you're anything like me - a rather tragically plump, socially inept 35-year-old Charlie Brown lookalike omega-male loser - you may have found the idea of E4's Tool Academy quite interesting: here are some cocksure laddish geezers who deserve being taken down a peg or two by their fed-up girlfriends, who've enrolled them in the TV show to save their relationship. But it hasn't quite worked out that way, and I'm left wondering who the tools at the tool academy are meant to be.
Are they the lads, some of whom seem rather unpleasant and others of whom seem quite normal, even likeable? Are they the girlfriends, some of whom seem to have more issues than their supposedly 'tool' other halves? Is it the lantern-jawed host who yuks in the first episode something along the lines of "If they split up I wouldn't mind going out with her?" - or are we the tools for watching it all?
The Tools are given names, like Football Tool, for a bloke who, er, is a semi-professional footballer. I suppose it would have been Spreadsheet Tool if he'd been an accountant. Then there's Twinkle Tool, who is apparently a bit FEMININE and therefore GAY; he doesn't DRINK enough and so is a TWINKLE. If you're not running around in a lager-fuelled frenzy quoting Guy Ritchie dialogue, you're FEMALE, which is WRONG. He gets swiftly booted out for admitting not being confident - how dare he not be confident! His Tool Academy report card gives him an F in ABILITY TO MAN UP. Ah yes, that wonderful phrase. Man up. As if being a man is being some kind of aggressive, shouty, pushy dick.
Those ones you feel a bit of sympathy for - and are immediately kicked out, for not being TV-friendly enough, since this is an elimination show, and elimination shows are about getting rid of the 'boring ones' and keeping in the 'fun ones'. And so there's Randy Tool. In the first episode we see him out on the lash, ending up in a nightclub cubicle with a woman and then chirping to his pals that he was fingering her. You might think that's not a tremendously good thing, but no, he's kept in - he wins his 'commitment' and 'trust' academy badges despite this rather unsavoury event.
Then there's Temper Tool, who may well be a mass of front and bravado, but acts like the kind of nut who'd happily smash your skull in because you looked at him funny in a kebab shop or a taxi queue. In one rather bizarre moment he tells an actor, who is pretending to be a doctor conducting a lie detector test, that he should be grateful he doesn't turn the desk over onto him. Nice guy. But despite these tantrums, he's not kicked out either and leaves of his own accord. Being aggressive, threatening violence or cheating on your girlfriend is OK in Tool Academy; not drinking enough, or not being confident, makes you a Twinkle, on the other hand, and you should MAN UP.
I know, I know. They keep the arseholes in to keep you watching for their comeuppance - for Randy Tool it's been flagged up since day one and is promised in next week's episode. But I don't think I can really be bothered to make it that far and I don't think it's particularly nice that the programme-makers, having known of this guy's infidelity, kept chugging along with the pretence with his partner so they could get a good 'reveal' out of it. I don't find the programme entertaining enough to keep me going through its frustrating and silly attitudes - though to be fair there was a fun bit involving the girlfriends dressed as grannies on mobility scooters - and I just end up feeling sorry for everyone involved. The tools, for being called tools when they don't always seem that tool-y; the girlfriends for flogging their relationship on national TV for a chance of a crappy holiday somewhere; and me, for trying to sit through the damned thing.
We've all got faults. A list of mine would go down the stairs, out the door, up the road, left at the traffic lights, all the way to Jupiter, and back again. Luckily though I'm not in some contrived TV show to win a bloody holiday in which my partner and I are made to go through a series of pointless exercises to prove I'm not a tool, by some weird criteria in which cheating and being aggressive is OK, but not being confident isn't. If that's the way it is, I'm a tool. I'm a tool for watching this programme; I know that much.
No related posts.


January 18th, 2011 - 10:14
All sounds suspiciously staged to me.
January 18th, 2011 - 11:02
I’m speechless.
January 18th, 2011 - 11:11
“are we the tools for watching it all?”
We have a winner.
January 18th, 2011 - 12:21
Yes, E4 have officially made their way through the bottom of the barrel to the shit underneath – and they’re still digging, if this is anything to go by. Caught the first couple of minutes of this yesterday and sat in slack-jawed horror until I recovered my wits and found the off button on my remote. Unbelievably awful.
January 18th, 2011 - 13:58
Totally agree. I found myself watching this last night, having failed to turn the TV off after Glee. It was fascinating and troubling at the same time.
If it were women who were being called whatever the female equivalent of tool is, would we be laughing?
These are real people who are being ridiculed, not to help them improve their relationships, but because it makes controversial and shocking TV.
The women are generally downtrodden, some of the men controlling – see Mr Angry who left last night. It is seen as acceptable for the men to treat their girlfriends so badly and for the girlfriends to accept it.
I won’t be watching again.
January 18th, 2011 - 14:50
Presumably that woman version would be called Cuntpetition.
Sorry.
January 18th, 2011 - 15:35
Sounds like bollocks TV to me. It will join the ranks of X-Factor, ICGMOOH and BB…. classified as the new “Opium of the Masses”!!
January 18th, 2011 - 18:21
I havnt been able to watch anything on since we went digital about 2 years ago and my old TV became obsloete.
I can’t say I miss it, but do occasionally think “hey maybe TV is not as bad as I remember, maybe I’ll buy myself one of those whizz bang digital TV’s so I can watch all those informative and entertaining programmes people talk about in work.”
Today was one of those days but then I read this post!
Thanks you’ve just saved me several hundred pounds
January 18th, 2011 - 19:01
http://www.theonion.com/articles/area-man-constantly-mentioning-he-doesnt-own-a-tel,429/
January 18th, 2011 - 19:32
This is perhaps a side issue, but you do realise you can get a digi box that means that old tele can still be used for under £20?
January 18th, 2011 - 19:33
There’s something deeply unsettling about it, particularly as ads for it are aired during Glee. Not comfortable viewing, really, almost unabashedly offensive. I confess I haven’t actually watched the show, but that’s mostly because I don’t want my brain to spontaneously convert into used toilet paper.
January 19th, 2011 - 08:39
Nearly as disturbing are the number of people that seem to be watching Glee.
January 19th, 2011 - 08:48
The phrase “About tools, by tools, for tools” suddenly sprang to mind.
January 19th, 2011 - 11:11
Stewart Lee put it well: “Watching Channel 4 is like staring into an open sewer. Watching E4 is like having a sewer diverted to run through your home.”
January 24th, 2011 - 23:57
If this was a show where men sent their girlfriends to some boot camp/academy because their girlfriends didn’t “shape up” it would not see the light of day.