Sympathy for Express writers
Picture the scene. You're a hard-working Daily/Sunday Express scribbler, chained to that desk 24/7 trying to carve out half-decent articles to a deadline, all the time attempting to maintain a veneer of credibility and integrity. Sure, you know your newspaper is turning into a bit of a BNP recruiting leaflet at times, but you don't work on that bit of it - you soothe that conscience with the knowledge that you're just doing the TV and showbiz stuff. It's not as if you're anything to do with those headlines on the front page or the slightly smelly agenda that comes from the top. No. You're just doing the candyfloss, the cheesecake, the bits that fill in the spaces, the telly stuff, the celebrity bits - and what's wrong with that?
And then you get told to write something good about Vanessa Feltz.
Those crumbling dreams. Those distant, hazy memories of when you wanted to be a journalist, and wanted to do something good - wanted to make a difference, be a good writer, see that name on the printed page next to something really special. All those hopes. Those aspirations. Those things you wanted to be, and do, and have.
And now... now you've got to write something good about the Vanessa Feltz show. Not because it's good - you know it's not good; you struggled through five minutes of it the other day, until whatshisname stumbled over his words for what seemed like the millionth time and called her 'sweetheart', your buttocks vice-locked together in squirming agony, transfixed by the awfulness yet desperate to change the channel to something, anything; anything but this. No, because it's on Channel Five, and, yes, it's now a Richard Desmond product, so you've got to write something good about the Vanessa Feltz show.
I know it's cruel of me, but I've started scouring the Express and Star websites for Good Things Written About The Vanessa Show. I can almost scent the tear-stained keyboards and the soft sound of sobbing in every paragraph, though they gamely battle on, and full credit to them for that. You can almost see the sandcastles of ambition being washed away in the tide. I don't get the sense of a programme these people really love, but an overwhelming sadness between the words, as if to say "I'm sorry. Please forgive me. I had to." We've all been there, having to do something we didn't particularly like in order to pay the mortgage, but come on - writing positive reviews of the Vanessa show is really cruel and unusual punishment.
Look, I may well be wrong. Maybe it is a fantastic TV show that happens to be on Five and happens to coincidentally get good reviews from Richard Desmond's newspapers from reviewers who completely love everything about it. That's not beyond the realms of possibility, is it? Well, you be the judge. Have a look at the programme - see if you can make it through ten minutes without flailing around the living room in a whirl of hate, knocking over bookcases and sending the cat flying behind the curtains - and you tell me it deserves reviews like this.
Further reading: Tabloid Watch - Express and Star plug new Channel 5 show
No related posts.


January 17th, 2011 - 13:40
I love this line from that review: the show features “a life coach who, most surprisingly, speaks a lot of sense if you believe in that sort of stuff.” I think the writer’s forbearance just about broke at that point.
January 17th, 2011 - 13:43
Anyone who writes that badly deserves to be at the Express. It may as well have been written on an asylum wall in excrement for all the sense it made.
January 17th, 2011 - 14:00
I’ll have to take someone else’s word for it about the show – I detuned Channel Five the day Dirty Des bought it – but that someone else isn’t going to be the Express.
January 17th, 2011 - 14:19
Tut tut, ITV1, using your TV programme to promote other ITV1 programmes. You’ll never catch a Richard Desmond product doing that! And tut tut you shows who fawn over celebrities; take a leaf out of Vanessa’s book and tell the slebs you hate them because they’re just SOOOOOO pretty!
Don’t feel too sorry for this writer; they’re the only one on a Desmond title still permitted to commit irony to the page.
January 17th, 2011 - 14:57
I have no sympathy for anyone who takes Desmond’s money, but your article is funny.
I can’t watch Neighbours since he bought Five, and that hurts.
January 17th, 2011 - 19:30
I’m reminded of the ending of that old black and white film “The Day The Earth Caught Fire,” starring the late Leo McKern as the editor of the Daily Express. At the end of the movie, we learn that the Russians and Yanks plan on detonating nukes at both poles in order to correct the rotational wobble that their previous experiment had inflicted on the Earth, hoping that this will correct its tumble.
As the film nears its end, we see the front page, held back until the results came through. One front page read “EARTH SAVED” and the oehte, “EARTH DOOMED.”
This day and age, I suspect they’d leave them both and run with the headline “COULD BEETROOTS CAUSE CANCER?” instead.
January 18th, 2011 - 09:28
That is a great film. If you look around that newsroom and compare it with today, it’ll be pretty sad.
January 18th, 2011 - 14:32
Whereas the Telegraph would go with “FIERY DOOM COULD AFFECT HOUSE PRICES.”
January 17th, 2011 - 19:31
You’ll have to excuse me. I meant to say “and the other.” These early nights. I really ought to write with the lights on.
January 18th, 2011 - 16:04
Personally, I find watching Vanessa on TV great sport. It’s funny in the way a really crap joke is funny. Remember Big Brother?
January 20th, 2011 - 00:44
You might want to refer to the papers as “the Express and the Star” since there is a newspaper called the “Express and Star” in the Midlands.
January 20th, 2011 - 18:13
It could be worse than writing about Vanessa, there was the poor fucker that had to write that tosh about light bulbs on Tuesday’s front page. Truly scraping the barrell.
March 20th, 2011 - 03:07
What about the others?