<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6Musing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/02/6musing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/02/6musing/</link>
	<description>Poundshop potshots at the media moral maze.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:51:16 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Larrington</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/02/6musing/comment-page-1/#comment-3718</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Larrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1468#comment-3718</guid>
		<description>One thing I don&#039;t understand is why it costs fifty-one million quid a year to run Radio 3 and only nine million to run 6Music.  They&#039;re both, er, people playing records and most musos played on R3 are dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I don&#8217;t understand is why it costs fifty-one million quid a year to run Radio 3 and only nine million to run 6Music.  They&#8217;re both, er, people playing records and most musos played on R3 are dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The BBC Stragetic Review Saga in five links &#171; Max Raymond</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/02/6musing/comment-page-1/#comment-3709</link>
		<dc:creator>The BBC Stragetic Review Saga in five links &#171; Max Raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1468#comment-3709</guid>
		<description>[...] Anton Vowl at Enemies Of Reason explaining what good may come of this saga using his own &#8216;tortured analogy&#8217;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Anton Vowl at Enemies Of Reason explaining what good may come of this saga using his own &#8216;tortured analogy&#8217;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: londonjustin</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/02/6musing/comment-page-1/#comment-3705</link>
		<dc:creator>londonjustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1468#comment-3705</guid>
		<description>I love The Wild Geese. 

That doesn&#039;t actually mean it&#039;s any good however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love The Wild Geese. </p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t actually mean it&#8217;s any good however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Scaramanga</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/02/6musing/comment-page-1/#comment-3695</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Scaramanga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 09:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1468#comment-3695</guid>
		<description>Like you said, it comes down to taste.

If they said they were going to scrap cricket coverage on LW, or Newsnight, there would be uproar.

It tries, and largely succeeds, in catering for as many tastes as possible.

And Wild geese is a supremely bad movie, and therefore marvellous for watching drunk, as most of the cast were when they amde it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like you said, it comes down to taste.</p>
<p>If they said they were going to scrap cricket coverage on LW, or Newsnight, there would be uproar.</p>
<p>It tries, and largely succeeds, in catering for as many tastes as possible.</p>
<p>And Wild geese is a supremely bad movie, and therefore marvellous for watching drunk, as most of the cast were when they amde it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirty Expat</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/02/6musing/comment-page-1/#comment-3693</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirty Expat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 07:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1468#comment-3693</guid>
		<description>As one of those dirty expats, living in a foreign country yet still following British news and loving the BBC, I almost wish the BBC would charge foreigners for access to iPlayer. I would be more than happy to pay it, and I know others would to. Surely they could also make a bit of profit off it? Not too sure about legal implications, but we can work through that, can&#039;t we Auntie?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As one of those dirty expats, living in a foreign country yet still following British news and loving the BBC, I almost wish the BBC would charge foreigners for access to iPlayer. I would be more than happy to pay it, and I know others would to. Surely they could also make a bit of profit off it? Not too sure about legal implications, but we can work through that, can&#8217;t we Auntie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Allwell</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/02/6musing/comment-page-1/#comment-3690</link>
		<dc:creator>George Allwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1468#comment-3690</guid>
		<description>James, great point. Anton, another great post, with lots of correct, and worrying points. They should just say &#039;fuck-off&#039; you do what you do and we will do what we do. I back our standards, choices and principles (public service and all that...). 

I, too, enjoyed the radio 4 coverage of the cricket, and have done since I was 9. Not only would I be mightily pissed off, I would considering Guy Fawkian actions.

I do suspect, however, that Radio 4, and all that goes with it, would be kept till the bitter end. &#039;They&#039; love it, the NIMBY&#039;S, and would be disgusted if it changed it output or standards. That is the crux, &#039;they&#039; love the BBC, so long as it transmits what &#039;they&#039; want it to. The just don&#039;t get the &#039;principles&#039;, that it should broadcast &#039;for all&#039;, and why should &#039;they&#039; pay for anyone else. Bit like health, benefits, foreign aid, asylum seekers, social services, to name but a few. 

I hate &#039;they&#039;, but I hope, after the next election, that we still have a broadcasting system to be proud of, like I am, and one which provides for all. No matter if we &#039;have to&#039; endure some of the tripe that comes with it. 

The alternative is programmes riddled with adverts, and subject to editorial profiteering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, great point. Anton, another great post, with lots of correct, and worrying points. They should just say &#8216;fuck-off&#8217; you do what you do and we will do what we do. I back our standards, choices and principles (public service and all that&#8230;). </p>
<p>I, too, enjoyed the radio 4 coverage of the cricket, and have done since I was 9. Not only would I be mightily pissed off, I would considering Guy Fawkian actions.</p>
<p>I do suspect, however, that Radio 4, and all that goes with it, would be kept till the bitter end. &#8216;They&#8217; love it, the NIMBY&#8217;S, and would be disgusted if it changed it output or standards. That is the crux, &#8216;they&#8217; love the BBC, so long as it transmits what &#8216;they&#8217; want it to. The just don&#8217;t get the &#8216;principles&#8217;, that it should broadcast &#8216;for all&#8217;, and why should &#8216;they&#8217; pay for anyone else. Bit like health, benefits, foreign aid, asylum seekers, social services, to name but a few. </p>
<p>I hate &#8216;they&#8217;, but I hope, after the next election, that we still have a broadcasting system to be proud of, like I am, and one which provides for all. No matter if we &#8216;have to&#8217; endure some of the tripe that comes with it. </p>
<p>The alternative is programmes riddled with adverts, and subject to editorial profiteering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How about a bit of solidarity for the BBC if not for 6 Music? - Chicken Yoghurt</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/02/6musing/comment-page-1/#comment-3689</link>
		<dc:creator>How about a bit of solidarity for the BBC if not for 6 Music? - Chicken Yoghurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1468#comment-3689</guid>
		<description>[...] in most things, one finds oneself in agreement with Anton Vowl&#8230; I&#8217;ve said before, personally 6Music never really troubles me at all, and I can&#8217;t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in most things, one finds oneself in agreement with Anton Vowl&#8230; I&#8217;ve said before, personally 6Music never really troubles me at all, and I can&#8217;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brennig</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/02/6musing/comment-page-1/#comment-3686</link>
		<dc:creator>Brennig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1468#comment-3686</guid>
		<description>I was told yesterday by a reliable industry person that the BBC wanted to cut loose the television station BBC 3 and save everything else. But the senior management projected such a fight from the unions (more staff are needed to operate a TV station than two radio stations), that the management opted for the easier path. It&#039;s an interesting scenario.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was told yesterday by a reliable industry person that the BBC wanted to cut loose the television station BBC 3 and save everything else. But the senior management projected such a fight from the unions (more staff are needed to operate a TV station than two radio stations), that the management opted for the easier path. It&#8217;s an interesting scenario.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/02/6musing/comment-page-1/#comment-3685</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1468#comment-3685</guid>
		<description>God, I wish the BBC would grow a pair too. Just once, I&#039;d love them to respond to one of the Daily Mail&#039;s increasingly-desperate attacks with &lt;i&gt;&quot;How about you let us carry on with our globally-respected news coverage, and you go and pay a few more paparazzo for upskirt shots of 16 year-old actresses? Run along, there&#039;s a good boy&quot;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God, I wish the BBC would grow a pair too. Just once, I&#8217;d love them to respond to one of the Daily Mail&#8217;s increasingly-desperate attacks with <i>&#8220;How about you let us carry on with our globally-respected news coverage, and you go and pay a few more paparazzo for upskirt shots of 16 year-old actresses? Run along, there&#8217;s a good boy&#8221;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
