Enemies of Reason Poundshop potshots at the media moral maze.

2Mar/107

6Musing

I imagine we're all searching for tortured analogies to try and describe the Beeb's decision to scrap 6Music. Some may liken it to a self-harming emo trying to draw attention to their greater underlying woes by cutting themselves; others may say it's like a navy scuttling their own ships for a tactical advantage.

For me, the dreadful 1978 Where-Eagles-Dare-in-Africa film The Wild Geese* comes to mind. It's obscured and tortured enough for one of my analogies, anyway. I am particularly thinking of the sequence where a hobbling and wounded Richard Harris, realising he won't make it onto the taxiing plane getting the mercenaries out of their fictional African dictatorship, begs friend Richard Burton to machine-gun him to death, to spare him a far worse death at the hands of the angry troops closing in on him.

Mark Thompson is Richard Burton and 6Music is Richard Harris. Far better, goes the logic, to be humanely despatched by your pal than to be torn to pieces by the angry forces who are looming in the distance.

As I said yesterday, there's a bit of a danger in assuming the need for cutbacks, which this pre-emptive strike by Auntie does. Because then people won't only say "Wait, how could you do that to my beloved 6Music?" but also come along with their own shopping lists of cutbacks. There will always be people who don't like a tax-funded broadcaster at all, others - with very loud voices and of course a platform from which to shout - who don't like quality state-funded competition with their own output, and others who just think the decisions are wrong.

What we don't know is how this will pan out, because a lot will depend on what happens at the general election. And we can all argue about the relative merits of the stations involved - as I've said before, personally 6Music never really troubles me at all, and I can't stand George 'Sacrificial' Lamb. But on the other hand, I spent a pleasant morning listening to live cricket on Radio 4 from Bangladesh, and I'd be mightily pissed off if that sort of thing got chucked out of the window. We've all got likes and dislikes; the question is how many likes should be catered for and whose likes trump other people's likes.

But what I do wonder is how much this decision has opened the door to further snipes at what money gets spent where at the BBC. You can actually see that as a positive thing, in some ways, and this decision has engaged with a demographic who might not ordinarily be concerned with BBC spending or writing to the Trust to put across their views. Quite a cost to pay for that, of course, so it's not been done deliberately to achieve this. Whatever the outcome of consultation over this matter, this won't be the end. The BBC has itself sent out the message loud and clear: We're spending too much. They may have picked a couple of things they regard as being more losable than others, but it might not be their choice as to what goes next. First 6Music and Asian Network and a quarter of the website output, and then what...?

The BBC's enemies - the commercial competitors who want bigger profits - aren't going to be content with just a couple of radio stations and a bit of the website going. Not that anyone thought they would be, I suppose. But they might sense an opportunity, ahead of an election, to make it a big issue, particularly if the Conservatives are planning even bigger cuts if they're returned to power.

Sometimes I just wish the BBC would grow a pair and fight hard for the things it believes in rather than bending over backwards and being hand-wringingly fair to critics who are less than fair when it comes to their attacks. But it appears we're not going to get that. It's not just Richard Harris who's going to get machine-gunned in this. There are a whole lot of people on that runway, struggling to get on that plane before it leaves.

/tortured analogy

* It really is a bad film. I mean, bad. It hums. When Roger Moore is one of the more restrained and credible performances in a film, you know there's trouble.

Be Sociable, Share!

No related posts.

Comments (7) Trackbacks (2)
  1. God, I wish the BBC would grow a pair too. Just once, I’d love them to respond to one of the Daily Mail’s increasingly-desperate attacks with “How about you let us carry on with our globally-respected news coverage, and you go and pay a few more paparazzo for upskirt shots of 16 year-old actresses? Run along, there’s a good boy”

  2. I was told yesterday by a reliable industry person that the BBC wanted to cut loose the television station BBC 3 and save everything else. But the senior management projected such a fight from the unions (more staff are needed to operate a TV station than two radio stations), that the management opted for the easier path. It’s an interesting scenario.

  3. James, great point. Anton, another great post, with lots of correct, and worrying points. They should just say ‘fuck-off’ you do what you do and we will do what we do. I back our standards, choices and principles (public service and all that…).

    I, too, enjoyed the radio 4 coverage of the cricket, and have done since I was 9. Not only would I be mightily pissed off, I would considering Guy Fawkian actions.

    I do suspect, however, that Radio 4, and all that goes with it, would be kept till the bitter end. ‘They’ love it, the NIMBY’S, and would be disgusted if it changed it output or standards. That is the crux, ‘they’ love the BBC, so long as it transmits what ‘they’ want it to. The just don’t get the ‘principles’, that it should broadcast ‘for all’, and why should ‘they’ pay for anyone else. Bit like health, benefits, foreign aid, asylum seekers, social services, to name but a few.

    I hate ‘they’, but I hope, after the next election, that we still have a broadcasting system to be proud of, like I am, and one which provides for all. No matter if we ‘have to’ endure some of the tripe that comes with it.

    The alternative is programmes riddled with adverts, and subject to editorial profiteering.

  4. As one of those dirty expats, living in a foreign country yet still following British news and loving the BBC, I almost wish the BBC would charge foreigners for access to iPlayer. I would be more than happy to pay it, and I know others would to. Surely they could also make a bit of profit off it? Not too sure about legal implications, but we can work through that, can’t we Auntie?

  5. Like you said, it comes down to taste.

    If they said they were going to scrap cricket coverage on LW, or Newsnight, there would be uproar.

    It tries, and largely succeeds, in catering for as many tastes as possible.

    And Wild geese is a supremely bad movie, and therefore marvellous for watching drunk, as most of the cast were when they amde it.

  6. I love The Wild Geese.

    That doesn’t actually mean it’s any good however.

  7. One thing I don’t understand is why it costs fifty-one million quid a year to run Radio 3 and only nine million to run 6Music. They’re both, er, people playing records and most musos played on R3 are dead.


Leave a comment