Enemies of Reason Poundshop potshots at the media moral maze.

5Jan/106

‘Non-standard issue’ and Gurkhas

You know earlier I was explaining why I moderate comments? Here are some good examples of why, underneath an article about Gurkhas 'overwhelming' military charities if they take up residency in the UK thanks to Joanna Lumley's campaign:

Yes, you read that right. All non-white people are 'non-standard issue'. Pink is the 'standard' colour for human beings, you see. And yes, immigrants are 'besmirching' our landscape.

LT also points out the difference between good immigrants (Gurkhas) and bad immigrants (everyone else):

That thought is quickly picked up and carried:

You see, certain types of immigrants have all done NOTHING for Britain. As opposed to those other brilliant types who have contributed such sparkling comments on Daily Mail stories. LT's view, however, that some immigrants should be allowed in is a little too mild for some commenters:

But others reserve particular venom for Joanna Lumley herself:

I imagine what will happen next is what usually happens with stories of this type. Having allowed this soup of witless cunts to outracist each other for a good while, comments will suddenly become suspended and will disappear into the ether, as if they never happened at all. The Mail will get to have its cake and eat it - set up the story (which isn't particularly unpleasant in itself, yet which presses a few of the hot buttons with phrases like 'influx' and 'overwhelmed'), get a ton of clicks from the usual suspects, then let the poison melt away like snowflakes, leaving no trace, as if it was never there.

It's a fairly smelly way of doing stuff - allowing loads of comments which you then withdraw at a future date. Unless the Mail thinks views like these are perfectly acceptable under its brand name and alongside its advertisers? But I don't think it does really. This fairly naked racism highlights why these commenters have come here - they know they're welcome, and it's not hard to see why, because others happily buy into the bollocks tabloid mythology about immigrants - you know, how those asylum seekers get given massive tellies and great big mansions and there's nothing anyone can do about it, the sort of stuff you read in the Mail on a regular basis:

I do agree with one thing: you have to wonder about the mentality of some people.

Be Sociable, Share!

Related posts:

  1. Remember all that sympathy for the Gurkhas?
  2. Sub-standard strikes again
Comments (6) Trackbacks (0)
  1. I particularily liked that the first comment was from a "missculture" …

  2. "this soup of witless cunts"

    I like that. That is a phrase and a half. There's more of value in those five words than in everything that lot have ever typed.

  3. Your message board cunts tag always makes me sad, what a pitiful display by these fools.

  4. I love how the Mail's readership has gotten so used to the Daily Mail stirring up their racist angst that the editors can't even contol it anymore.

  5. Just started to read your blog and, to coin a phrase, "It's a right riveting read". (But in a good way.)

  6. gah! argh! i can't handle it anymore! it's just such a disgrace, such a massive massive disgrace that these views get millions of green arrows! it;s so stupid. why can't people understand that the daily mail and the daily express is lying to them!
    i have to say though – i loved (iin a hate way obv) the comment about how kurds, afghanis and iraquis (sic) have no allegiance to the mother country.
    the mother what?? i wanted to say something clever about middle eastern history and colonial rule in relation to the mother country comment but am too angry with the daily mail to form my thoughts properly. so will think about it in the mean time!


Leave a comment


No trackbacks yet.