13Dec/094
A bit flaky
How the BBC covered opposition to a hostile takeover of Cadbury's:
I suppose it makes sense, when a workforce is threatened, to go to the representatives of that workforce to get their side of the story. That would seem like the most logical way of telling the story, I suppose. But how is the Mail covering it, out of interest?
Ah I see. Well if the 'Flake girls' responsible for 'sexy adverts' are backing the campaign, then I think we can be assured of success.
No related posts.
Buy my book, it’s great
Switch site
Donate
Recent Posts
- Cheerio, cheerio, cheerio…
- Children died
- The letters you never get around to sending
- Applying again
- I just sent Robin round – 2
Most Commented On
Recent Comments
- Iain on Applying again
- Roger on The letters you never get around to sending
- Dave Hodgkinson on The letters you never get around to sending
- droid on The letters you never get around to sending
- Rogue_Leader on The letters you never get around to sending
About Me
Hello. I'm a Bristol-based writer and soon-to-be-redundant journalist. You can read more about me and the Enemies site here, or follow me on Twitter. Email me if you like - antonvowl at live dot co dot uk
If you're struggling to read the site please use the drop down box below to increase the text size.
December 13th, 2009 - 17:18
And of course, this has absolutely nothing to do with a flimsy excuse to run pictures of fruity women…
December 13th, 2009 - 20:29
I wouldn't trust the opinions of anyone who thinks eating chocolate in the bath is a good idea.
December 14th, 2009 - 08:11
Not at all related to the post, but have you seen this fantastic mail headline?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1235517/Prince-Philip-causes-controversy-joking-blind-IRA-heros-tie-choice.html
God help the sub that came up with that corker!
December 15th, 2009 - 19:13
if you hadn't said that newspaper report was the mail's, i would have sworn it was from the sun. i haven't seen the sun's coverage of this story but that's how i'd imagine it to be. so much for the mail being better than the other tabloids, eh?