Enemies of Reason Poundshop potshots at the media moral maze.

14May/094

Mail: People who complain about homophobia are Nazis

It seems simple enough, in Mail land. If you complain about people's attitudes towards homosexuality, then you are a 'Nazi'. A 'Nazi' in the Littlejohn/Gaunt mould, that is, ie someone who has views that you don't can be called a Nazi. As the man who led to the end of Gaunt's career in radio pointed out, though, you need to put something in front of 'Nazi' to be able to get away with it - the Mail has chosen 'adoption' this time. Because the Nazis were so fond of homosexual people, weren't they? It's a really good analogy, Mr Mail.

But Gaunt was making a point against adoption services too, calling them Nazis for not allowing smokers to adopt. Anyone who's been watching the recent series of documentaries on Channel 4 about adoption (and I'm guessing that excludes the entirety of the Mail workforce) will have seen just how hard it is to adopt a child, even if you *do* pass all the criteria and tests, and even if you've done all the training - and yes, especially if you happen to be a same-sex couple.

People like the Mail and Gaunt ignore all the evidence. In their minds, adoption agencies hand over children like sweets to gay couples and ignore nice middle-class folk. There's no evidence for this, but this is what they think, so this is what they describe as being the truth.

And there's another point worth making. The Mail described people who complain about homophobia as 'Nazis' in one story, but guess what? When the 'homophobia' in question comes from their nemesis, then it's perfectly acceptable to be offended on behalf of the gay community:

Those folk who complained about Ross aren't 'Nazis' at all, of course. They're perfectly acceptable individuals. And look at the irony:

Ross was involved in a light-hearted discussion about prizes in a competition themed around the fictional teen pop star when he joked: ‘If your son asks for a Hannah Montana MP3 player, you might want to already think about putting him down for adoption before he brings his...erm...partner home.’

Up for adoption, Wossy? But as we already know, adoption agencies are infiltrated by evil forces designed to make children gay and favour gay couples over nice straight ones. And the people who enforce this are NAZIS.

Be Sociable, Share!

Related posts:

  1. What happens if I complain…
  2. Mail: People who retouch photos are bastards
  3. Express in freefall: making money from racism, homophobia and hatred
  4. Littlejohn: Obsessed with Nazis and fascists, demeaning to women, a man with gay issues
  5. It’s because they work with sick people
Comments (4) Trackbacks (0)
  1. On the other hand, the adoption agencies’ use of the word ‘retarded’ does imply a little bit of nazi like tendencies.

    Kind of lessens the impact of criticising those who condemn gay people who adopt, using the word ‘retarded’, sadly.

  2. Great post, even by your usual high standards. A very nice twining of Mail themes.

  3. I have the pleasure of running a cub pack where the kids pretty much all come from fantastic loving homes. their have been perhaps 3 kids out of hundreds that have passed through in the last 15 years who’s home circumstances could be described as “troubled” but even these were not exactly top end cases.

    A friend of mine though runs a pack in a particularly grim area and has a lot of kids in appauling circumstances. She’s had 8 year olds turn up drunk, regularly. Half the pack are in care.

    You look at kids like that and you wonder, what would their lives be like if they were brought up by loving parents who had something like a fucking clue?

    While their are kids out there like that that need a decent loving home then it shouldn’t matter if potential adoptive parents are single, a couple, gay or straight.

    It’s time the pricks at the Mail realised that it’s human beings we are talking about here.

  4. Yeah. Using the word “retarded” was a tactical mistake.

    Although I agree with the sentiment I take exception to the phrasing because I am a politically correct, wishy-washy, sandle-wearing, commy liberal.


Leave a comment


No trackbacks yet.