Eek! Gay people! Ooh!
For those of you in a comfortable metropolitan cosmopolitan metrosexual tolerant nice kind of place in the fluffy clouds where people are nice to other people and being gay isn't seen as being the mark of Satan himself, can I just remind you of the British press.
I mean, you may well live in the kind of urban or suburban community where gay people, far from being reviled and driven into shameful obscurity, are quite openly accepted as being equal human beings, despite not being in the majority. Who knows. Where you live may even be creeping into the latter part of the 20th century, where homosexuality is legal, gayness is understood as being something quite normal and people are allowed to be open about their proclivities. But one thing's for sure: the British press don't live there.
They live in a world that is forever the 1950s, where it's always winter and people are always happy, despite their families having been wiped out in the war, despite their houses having been turned into rubble, despite rationing and being half-starving, because there aren't any black or Asian people around, men are allowed to beat and rape their wives and, for one thing, gay people certainly aren't allowed to be open about it, for fear of having the shit beaten out of them.
Ally Ross of the Sun has the ability to be funny and clever. He is neither in this piece of sub-Garry-Bushell shit where he slags off John Barrowman - not for being shit, but for being gay:
There are side-splitters from the moment Barrowman — “The man who can do everything”, except impersonate a heterosexual — opens the show singing I’m So Excited by The Pointer Sisters.
Hoho, Ally. Top skills there, pal. Keep going though. Let's see if we can really find something funny in there:
Pelvis thrusting, capped teeth a-rattling, he rocks it like Val Doonican, in an iron lung, and I’d urge anyone who missed it to watch the routine on The BBC’s iPlayer. You’ll witness something “special”.
Do you mean 'special needs'? Bonus points for a disability jibe on top of a gay sneer, though, if you do. I mean, that's really quite excellently done. And so hilariously great, as well.
The [show] they eventually settled for was a camp twist on Jimmy Savile’s old format. It’s Hom’ll Fix It. “The show that makes your performance dreams come true.” Except they’re not your dreams and they don’t come true.
Oh Ally! Stop! That's far too clever for me! Instead of Jim'll Fix It, it's, heh, and this is great, Hom'll Fix It. Haha! Do you see? Do you see? Isn't it funny though? Isn't it? Eh? Isn't it? See, it's funny because he's gay and so therefore he's a Homo! Hoho! Eh! Eh!
The cause, however, was definitely John Barrowman. A man who, for box-ticking reasons, I assume, is allowed to run amok at the Barrowman Broadcasting Corporation.
And there's the nastiness behind the smile on Ally Ross's pigshit-ugly photo byline. Barrowman must have got his job, not because people like him but simply because he's gay. Because this is the BBC and that's what they do - they ignore their entire viewership to give a job to someone who's not good enough but who is gay. According to Ross. Mind you I wonder if the same box-ticking is at work at the Sun? Maybe Ross ticks the one marked 'unfunny cunt'...? Who knows.
This is the same Sun, of course, who unhilariously called Derren Brown a 'mind bender' and couldn't help chuckling away with sub-playground insults. It's as if they haven't even grown up and can't be bothered to. Which I suppose is fine unless you're a national newspaper. Which they kind of are.
Not that it's just the Sun, though. The Mail is even more vitriolic in is hatred of otherness, especially gayness, and roars against the very idea that children might be told that it exists - for fear that they might experiment and become teh evil gayz themselves.
What the Mail would like, I think, is a return to the cosy world of Section 28, where teachers were banned from 'normalising' gayness. Not that it killed off homosexuality, mind, which somehow still managed to exist despite children not having been told about it - why, it's almost as if people might be naturally gay and not conditioned into being so by evil sex education... but no, surely not - but that establishes the good/bad dynamic to make sure the 'normal' people are straight and the 'abnormal' people are gay. They wheel in an idiot, who says:
Simon Calvert, of the Christian Institute, said that 'pressing the virtues of homosexuality' could lead to more experimentation, which could be 'harmful' to children.
He said: 'What we don't want to see is vulnerable young people being exploited by outside groups which want to normalise homosexuality.
It's a classic example where a quote has been found to say a certain thing. Of all the people they could have quoted - all the Christians they could have quoted, for that matter - they find someone who's dead-set against 11-year-olds being told something that in all probability they're pretty much aware of already: gayness happens.
Is it really something to be afraid of? Are our newspapers forever doomed to be stuck in that "see no evil" void of consciousness? Must we forever pretend these things don't happen, or sneer at people who are openly gay and claim that the only reason they got their jobs was for 'box-ticking' reasons? Well, if we're in the press we must. But the rest of the world is thankfully a little different. This isn't the village, and there isn't only the one gay in it. It's about time newspapers fucking well grew up and accepted it.
Related posts:



April 28th, 2009 - 10:20
Nice piece, I agree with you about Ally Ross too, he’s a better writer than that.
If you want to get angry, proper set fire to the internet angry just visit the Sun’s forum, the comments about d@rkies alone will melt your brain.
April 28th, 2009 - 10:34
Is it just me or is all the progress made in this area (and other areas of equality) made in the 90′s being slowly eroded? It’s like we’re very slowly moving back to the sensibilites of the 70′s and 80′s.
From the Sachs-gate showing a return to Mary Whitehouse histrionics, to the Mail and Sun et al returning to prominence as ‘bastions of moral guardianship,’ this whole country is getting a very wierd place to be.
April 28th, 2009 - 13:04
“Is it just me or is all the progress made in this area (and other areas of equality) made in the 90′s being slowly eroded? It’s like we’re very slowly moving back to the sensibilites of the 70′s and 80′s.”
Not just you, no – the erosion has taken place over the past decade. Little Britain had a character called Ting Tong Macadangdang, for Christ’s sake. Chris Moyles gets away with casual homophobia on his morning radio show. There’s been a return to ‘bumming’ jokes and general “mind your backs, lads!” humour. ‘Chav’ and ‘pikey’ are acceptable terms.
The country’s attitudes have been shifting to the Right for some time now, and you can see this reflected in popular media. Comedy especially is a good sociological tool for judging the climate of a period; how did The 11 O’Clock Show somehow become the Beyond A Fringe for the 21st Century?
Personally (and unrealistically), I dream of a day when same-sex couples can pick their kids up from school without anyone batting an eyelid. On the more likely side, I think we should stress the importance of sex education (including homosexuality) as a matter of public health – ‘morals’ should barely enter into it. How many parents give their kids a proper grounding in the sexual health information? Do they know about Cowper’s Fluid, for instance?
April 28th, 2009 - 19:41
I guess I should put in one of my regular comments. Please don’t think that this twat from The Christian Institute speaks for all Christians. People like him and that other arsehole Stephen Green wind the likes of me right up and are an embarassment.
April 28th, 2009 - 19:53
Hom’ll fix it doesn’t even make any sense. I don’t know why anyone would think it worked as a joke on any level.
“Little Britain had a character called Ting Tong Macadangdang, for Christ’s sake.”
The problem is that these days stuff like this is excused on the grounds of being, like totally ironic yeah? It’s called post-modern comedy yeah? Where you like, make racist/sexist/homophobic jokes but, like, you’re allowed to laugh because we don’t mean it. And you’ll feel a bit guilty for laughing anyway so it’s all good. And sometimes that is a legitimate defence, but it seems increasingly that some folks are slopping on a very thin coating of this post-modern irony argument and in some cases none at all.
‘how did The 11 O’Clock Show somehow become the Beyond A Fringe for the 21st Century?’
Remember, this is a country that apparently can’t get enough of such artistic masterpieces as Two Pints Of Lager and Cordern and Horne and it’s wide range of knob jokes.