"We published the extracts in the belief held in good faith that we had Kate's permission to do so.
"It is now clear that our belief was misplaced, and that, in fact, Kate neither approved of nor knew the extracts were to be published."
Hmm. Easy mistake to make, thinking that someone who recently sued you for false accusations and has warned you off for intruding on their privacy would be delighted for you to print details of their diary. Very, very easy mistake to make.
A less easy mistake to make if you actually fucking well attempted to make contact with that person or their easily-contactible media adviser, I grant you, but these things happen, don't they? I mean it's not as if the article was the front-page lead and quite a few inside pages as well, is it?
Ah. I see.
No related posts.