Anyone believe this?
"We published the extracts in the belief held in good faith that we had Kate's permission to do so.
"It is now clear that our belief was misplaced, and that, in fact, Kate neither approved of nor knew the extracts were to be published."
Hmm. Easy mistake to make, thinking that someone who recently sued you for false accusations and has warned you off for intruding on their privacy would be delighted for you to print details of their diary. Very, very easy mistake to make.
A less easy mistake to make if you actually fucking well attempted to make contact with that person or their easily-contactible media adviser, I grant you, but these things happen, don't they? I mean it's not as if the article was the front-page lead and quite a few inside pages as well, is it?
Is it?
Ah. I see.
No related posts.
Buy my book, it’s great
Switch site
Donate
Recent Posts
- Cheerio, cheerio, cheerio…
- Children died
- The letters you never get around to sending
- Applying again
- I just sent Robin round – 2
Most Commented On
Recent Comments
- Iain on Applying again
- Roger on The letters you never get around to sending
- Dave Hodgkinson on The letters you never get around to sending
- droid on The letters you never get around to sending
- Rogue_Leader on The letters you never get around to sending
About Me
Hello. I'm a Bristol-based writer and soon-to-be-redundant journalist. You can read more about me and the Enemies site here, or follow me on Twitter. Email me if you like - antonvowl at live dot co dot uk
If you're struggling to read the site please use the drop down box below to increase the text size.