Enemies of Reason Poundshop potshots at the media moral maze.

17Sep/082

*Vomits*

You'll recall from previous scribblings here that the Mail, while ostensibly hateful towards paedophiles like Gary Glitter, doesn't mind people clicking on its website to look at photos of young girls.

Well, here's a story about a 14-year-old child actress which brings to mind the classic Charlotte Church/Daily Star moment:

My, hasn't she grown! Dakota Fanning passes the awkward phase with flying colours

Essentially, a child actress has gone through puberty so the Mail and its readers can salivate over the photos (with a handy enlargeable feature).

At the premiere for her controversial new film Hounddog, the 14-year-old unveiled a mature new look showing she's well on her way to being all grown up.

Christ, that's a bit grim, isn't it? Is this news of any discernible kind whatsoever?

A reader's comment:

A very talented actress, who is turning out to be a beautful young lady.
- Nic, Manchester, UK, 17/9/2008 11:07

Eugh.

Be Sociable, Share!

Related posts:

  1. Who could have made such a comment…?
  2. Shannon Matthews: The intrusion continues
  3. Ewwwwww
  4. Eeek! Outrage! Evil! Naughty BBC!
  5. The Mail, Laura Robson and Cher Lloyd
Comments (2) Trackbacks (0)
  1. A similar story can be found on http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1056834/Is-Princess-Eugenie-showing-bit-Royal-ought-to.html

    Which the Mail have published three large pictures for us all to wank over.

  2. It was either the Star or the Sport several years ago who had a picture of a young girl with her hands covering up her breasts with a caption underneath along the lines of “Nikki has enormous 44DD funbags and because she turns 16 tomorrow you’ll be able see them in the paper.”

    Appalling double standards


Leave a comment


No trackbacks yet.